Since I started this blog, I’ve discovered an entire world of book bloggers and reviewers. I’ve learned that it’s possible to request to read books before their publication date, and I’ve learned more about the endless resource that is my local library.
As I follow more book bloggers, I’ve noticed that most everyone has a few things in common. Pretty much everyone has a review policy, book tags are fun to do in between reviews and original content, and book reviews are accompanied by a star rating of some kind.
Every time I posted a review I wondered if I was doing something wrong by not using a clear rating system.
Still, I’ve decided against using one for a few reasons.
My opinion is often one extreme or the other.
Usually, I either love a book or I hate it. (Hate definitely encompassing terrible boredom.)
I find it difficult on Goodreads to rate anything between 1 and 5, and feel grossly forced every time I do. I don’t want to seem too harsh or too generous with my ratings, so I compromise – which I don’t think is good for anyone. I have a great deal of enthusiasm for things that may be cliché tropes, or silly premises. Maybe I’ll just be in the wrong mindset for a book and give it a (potentially undeserved) 1 star rating.
I might love a book that you’ll hate, or hate a book that you’ll love.
Reading is a very personal and subjective experience. If I love something about a subject that you find dry and uninteresting, but you pick it up because you trust in my five star review, I’ve most likely wasted your time. Similarly, if you love a book because it addresses a personal issue that you feel touched reading about, there’s no guarantee that I’ll even be interested in it – maybe I’ll give it 1 star and you’ll never pick it up!
Which brings me to my final point:
I write about what I like and didn’t like about a book so that you can make an informed choice.
Its nigh on impossible to be objective when reviewing a book, and I don’t think it would be a benefit if I was. Passion, whether it be positive or negative says a lot about a story. When I write a review, I’ll focus on the specific reasons I liked or didn’t like a book. I do this to try and be fair so that if there are things I didn’t like, you can figure out if those are things you’d like! I feel that sometimes people see a star review and ignore or skim the text that goes along with it.
While it’s true that means you have to actually read through the entire review, I hope that if you’re following the site you enjoy it enough to do so and that you find it worthwhile.
Do you enjoy using or reading star ratings? Do you read reviews without star ratings? Are there other things that make reviews more fun or reader friendly for you?